A brief summary:
This chapter focuses on Boy B and to the details surrounding
the way he became friends with Jack when they were children. Boy B was
mentioned briefly in the opening chapter, described simultaneously as ‘friend,
accomplice, instigator’ and ‘nemesis’. In many respects B is the polar opposite
of A: wild and scruffy, a year younger and with a propensity for violence. He
has an older brother who no one messes with and exudes confidence in his swagger.
But beneath this hard exterior B seems to share the same sense of loneliness as
A. This is what makes them friends.
Trigell gives details about how Jack was bullied at school
and how he tried to hide his shame from his parents. The reader learns that as
the bullying got worse Jack began to truant from school. It was during one of
his days bunking from school that Jack comes across A. The pair strike up a
relationship based upon on their shared sense of isolation: A without friends,
and parents and teachers to notice, whilst B retreating into ignorance and
wildness as a result of something to do with his infamous brother.
![]() |
| Are children inherently good or evil? |
The chapter ends with a confrontation between some of Jack’s
tormentors and both boys walking home after spending the day together. After
sensing an opportunity to further intimidate their helpless victims, the
bullies are surprised by a violent attack by the much smaller and younger B. He
sets about the older boys with a disturbing sense of unrestrained violence,
hitting and kicking them in to submission. The attack is quickly over and the
pair become even closer friends as a result of their experience.
- In what ways is Boy B different to Boy A? Are they really so different after all?
- Look at the description of Boy B. How does Trigell use language (profanity, sentence structure, cultural references) to present a clearer picture of the type of boy that he is?
- Although he is described as ‘ignorant’, in many respects it seems that Boy B has a great deal of experience of life. He seems more like a man than a boy. How does Trigell achieve this and what is he trying to say about his character?
- What does the fact that Jack wont tell his parents about being bullied imply about his family life? Does this connect in any way to the absence of his parents in the first chapter where he is released from prison?
- What do you make of the line ‘Children can be monsters too.’ Do you agree with this statement, or do you think circumstances create monsters?
- Why is the passage about Mrs Johnston’s views on Jack written in italics? To what extent does it make you read it differently?
- Is Boy B a bad influence on Jack, or is the situation more complicated than that? It might help to closely read the final passage of the chapter where Boy B is annotating the Bible he stole from church.

In this chapter we get introduced to Boy B and Boy B walks and acts in a way which people would be scared off. When he walk he has his 'fist balled' which he has 'adopted from his older brother'. This shows that his older brother is his role model and not a good one to any boy. His brother must have a big impact on Boy B's life because his brother showed him how to walk and fight. Trigell says that his older brother was not to be messed with which shows that the family must bad people. This gives boy B confidence to do anything he wants because he has a brother.
ReplyDeleteIn this chapter we learn that there is another boy, boy b who is alone and doesn't have any friends but is the complete opposite to boy a. boy a gets bullied and has no confidence whatsoever but boy b has confidence built up because he has an older brother that's not to be messed around with.His brother is his role model he looks up to him so much as he was the one who taught him how to fight. But there aren't that different from each other as both of them are individuals that walk around and no one wants to be with them.
ReplyDeleteBoy A and Boy B become similar, because boy B's aggressive and violent attitude rub off on boy A. B has had a horrible 'upbringing', if you can call it that. Being molested by his brother, and fighting local lads isn't exactly a nice way to grow up. A could have had a much better background, had the teachers and parents taken action against the bullying. Had social services taken more action on how B was living, he could have avoided the trouble, however all these factors build up, and the boys were left in a state of misery, which led to the murder. None of these things excuse the crime, but show that the boys are not born evil, no-one is. It's our surroundings and influences that ultimately decide what we do.
ReplyDelete